ГУЛаг Палестины - Лев Гунин

black bunting, kept guard over its native son. Wreaths from the

Ukrainian Parliament, co-workers and friends surrounded the coffin.

Perhaps as a carryover from the Communist-atheist state of the past, the

wake of devoid of all Christian symbols and rites.

Vadim's father sat at the foot of the coffin, numb to the proceedings.

As a few speakers addressed the crowd, he wiped tears away from his

weary, red eyes. Vadim's mother was too weak to make the trip from the

family's home in Svitlovodsk to Kiev.

Mykola Okhmakevych, the stagnant, Communist head of the State Television

and Radio, whose removal has been pressed for by both democratic

deputies and workers of the television station, said a few uninspiring

words. Often harshly criticized by Vadim and his colleagues, Mr.

Okhmakevych now spoke of how Vadim had always loved his job. An angry

mourner, who saw this hypocrisy, cried out: "He loved Ukraine above

all. He loved Ukraine, say it."

We all descended the steps with Vadim for the last time. The coffin was

then placed in a vehicle for Vadim's journey home to Svitlovodsk,

Kirovohrad Oblast, his final resting place.

x x x

It has been almost a week now since my phone rang just before midnight,

on Valentine's Day, February 14. It was my friend and colleague Dmytro

Ponamarchuk. Yet his voice sounded different.

"I don't know how to say this, Marta. Vadim Boyko burned to death

tonight." I could not believe what I was hearing: "What is this, a

cruel joke?"

Dmytro, working at the radio station, had been called about a fire at

Vadim's apartment; the fire department reported that his television had

blown up. Dmytro arrived at the scene just an hour or so after the

reported fire, only to find Vadim's body sprawled across the floor,

burned beyond recognition. There was nothing left of his apartment, a

dormitory-type dwelling in a building that housed quite a number of

State television and Radio workers.

News of Vadim's death spread quickly among fellow journalists - many of

whom had attended Kiev State with Vadim, many of whom worked with him on

numerous projects.

He was an elected democratic deputy from Kremenchuk, Poltava Oblast. He

had come from the neighboring town in Kirovohrad oblast, just across the

Dnipro River, arriving in the capital city of Kiev in the early 1980s to

obtain a college education.

And from then on, he gained popularity as the founder and host of

"Hart," one of the first serious investigative shows on Ukrainian

television, reporting on everything from Chornobyl to Shcherbytsky.

After he was elected a deputy to the Ukrainian Parliament in March 1990,

he was appointed vice chairman of the standing parliamentary Committee

on Glasnost and the Mass Media, a job he took very seriously, often

going to Moscow to discuss problems of disinformation in Ukraine, as

presented by central television.

But Vadim never forgot his first vocation - journalism - and he would

often join his colleagues, including a few of us foreign correspondents,

on the press balcony of Parliament during the sessions to give us some

inside news or highlights of his commission's work.

He was our friend, and with his death, our circle has been broken. Many

of us - Ukrainian journalists and foreign correspondents, as well as a

few of his close friends outside this journalistic fraternity - spent

last week trying to come to terms with the tragedy that has struck us.

We cannot believe that his death was just pure accident; although it is

reported that 8,000 people a year in the former Soviet Union die due to

their television sets exploding, we all believe that Vadim would have

survived this kind of accident.

We have gone through the story over and over. Most of us saw him in

Parliament on Wednesday afternoon; he was excited and invigorated by new

opportunities: he was applying for a National Foundation internship for

the spring in Washington, D.C., he was going to travel on business with

Ukraine's deputy prime minister. His dancing blue eyes were smitten

with the possibilities of new TV shows and programs in an independent

Ukraine.

None of us saw Vadim in Parliament on Thursday or Friday, February

13-14; he missed a few meetings he had scheduled on Friday.

Currently, there are many rumors flying around Kiev surrounding Vadim's

death, based on political, business and personal motivations.

Parliamentary committees have promised to work on an investigation,

although no special committee has been formed to investigate what many

democratic deputies, among them Les Taniuk and Stepan Khmara, have

labelled as murder. Some speculate that Vadim's TV work in Chornobyl

may have triggered an early death...

On Friday, February 14, Nezavisimaya Gazeta (Independent Newspaper) in

Moscow ran an interview with Vadim on journalists' responsibilities and

cooperation between Moscow and Kiev.

"At this time, we (referring to Russian and Ukrainian journalists) can

be friends, if we are honest to the end. We are currently living in a

commonwealth, the root of the word is found in the word "druh,"

friend... We will never become true friends, until we journalists

understand that we are the ones who can, who have the responsibility to

stop our peoples from total degradation, from the catastrophe that can

occur between our peoples," he said. "If we cannot prevent this we stop

being journalists. We will become persons who today do their work and

tomorrow, one by one, are destroyed."

Vadim's deep sense of responsibility, his courage and commitment to the

truth will always be admired by his friends and colleagues. And we are

all committed to learning the truth.

Given the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death, I can only

hope that his last interview prophecy did not become self-fulfilling.

Mr. Safer, you travelled to Ukraine looking for stories of persecution and violence

against Jews and Russians, you failed to find the evidence, but you broadcast the story

anyway. All the while, you were surrounded by stories of persecution and violence

against Ukrainians, but that plentiful evidence you ignored. In other words, you went

to Ukraine not to discover its reality, but to confirm your prejudice. You played the

role not of journalist, but of propagandist. Given the opportunity to make a

contribution toward protecting the lives of journalists in Ukraine by broadcasting the

story of Vadim Boyko, you declined. Showing anything on 60 Minutes that might win

sympathy for Ukrainians was contrary to your plan.

Had you managed to find a Jewish member of parliament and television broadcaster who had

died in Ukraine under mysterious circumstances, then you would have had one small piece

of evidence for the anti-Ukrainian conclusions that you offered. Had you managed to

find a Russian member of parliament and television broadcaster who had died in Ukraine

under mysterious circumstances, then you would have had one small piece of evidence for

the anti-Ukrainian conclusions that you offered. However, you found neither of these

things. In Ukraine, death under mysterious circumstances is reserved for prominent

Ukrainians, which conclusion you had no interest in broadcasting.

Below, I identify four incidents which I have brought to your attention either in three

earlier letters, or in the present one. Although the first two cases occurred before

your broadcast of 23Oct94, and the second two occurred after, all serve to support the

conclusion that within today's Ukraine, it is Ukrainians who are the targets of

violence:

Date of my letter

Subject of my letter

Date of Attack

Violence that you should have reported in your 23Oct94 The Ugly Face of Freedom

15May99

Who murdered Volodymyr Ivasiuk?

April 1979

30Jun99

Who murdered Vadim Boyko?

February 14, 1992

Violence that you might have caused by your 23Oct94 The Ugly Face of Freedom

09Apr99

Who blew the hands off Maksym Tsarenko?

Summer 1995

17May99

Who murdered Volodymyr Katelnytsky?

July 7-8, 1997

As the first two of the above attacks occurred prior to your 23Oct94 broadcast, then

your fault is that you neglected to report them. And as the second two attacks occurred

after your 23Oct94 broadcast, then your fault is that you may have helped cause them.

That is, your 23Oct94 broadcast, The Ugly Face of Freedom, served to demonstrate to

Ukraine's assassins not only that violence against Ukrainians would go unreported in the

world press, but also that even as Ukrainians continued to be butchered, the world press

would portray them - the victim Ukrainians - as themselves butchers. You did not

yourself wield any knife or pull any trigger or tighten any garotte, but you informed

those that were predisposed to do so that they might expect impunity if they did. For

this reason, I consider you to have blood on your hands, some of it Maksym Tsarenko's,

and some of it Volodymyr Katelnytsky's.

Lubomyr Prytulak

cc: Yaakov Bleich, Ed Bradley, Jeffrey Fager, Don Hewitt, Steve Kroft, Andy Rooney,

Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace, Simon Wiesenthal.

HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE SAFER 1302 hits since 01Jul99

Morley Safer Letter 12 01Jul99 Who murdered Borys Derevyanko?

The plainest moral to be drawn from the Derevyanko-Hurvits story is that when a

muckraking Ukrainian editor takes on a corrupt Jewish politician, the Ukrainian editor

ends up dead.

July 1, 1999

Morley Safer

60 Minutes, CBS Television

51 W 52nd Street

New York, NY

USA 10019

Morley Safer:

The Committee to Protect Journalists described the contract killing of Ukrainian editor

Borys Derevyanko thusly:

Borys Derevyanko, Vechernyaya Odessa

Date of Death: August 11, 1997

Place of Death: Odessa

Derevyanko, editor in chief of Vechernyaya Odessa, a popular and

influential thrice-weekly newspaper, was fatally shot at point-blank

range on his way to work on the morning of August 11 near the Press

House, where the newspaper's offices are located. Colleagues believe

the killing of Derevyanko, who was editor of Vechernyaya Odessa for 24

years, was related to the newspaper's opposition to the policies of

Odessa's mayor. The chief regional prosecutor declared the murder a

contract killing and launched an official investigation. Local

authorities announced in September that they had arrested a suspect,

described as a professional assassin, who confessed to killing

Derevyanko, but they gave no details about his confession.

I would add that the Odessa mayor which the above account neglects to name was the

corrupt Eduard Hurvits, who was particularly threatened by Borys Derevyanko's opposition

because of municipal elections that were coming up in 1998. The comment concerning the

arrest of an assassin gives a misleading impression - in today's Ukraine, contract

killings are never solved, and those who order them are never punished.

Today, Borys Derevyanko is dead, and Eduard Hurvits, barred by his corruption from

holding the office of mayor of Odessa, continues his criminal career as a member of the

Ukrainian parliament. Photographs of Derevyanko and Hurvits are shown below:

Newspaper editor

Borys Derevyanko

Odessa Mayor

Eduard Hurvits

The table which I began in my letter to you of 30Jun99 can now be elaborated with

another entry:

Date of my letter

Subject of my letter

Date of Attack

Violence that you should have reported in your 23Oct94 The Ugly Face of Freedom

15May99

Who murdered Volodymyr Ivasiuk?

April 1979

30Jun99

Who murdered Vadim Boyko?

February 14, 1992

Violence that you might have caused by your 23Oct94 The Ugly Face of Freedom

09Apr99

Who blew the hands off Maksym Tsarenko?

Summer 1995

17May99

Who murdered Volodymyr Katelnytsky?

July 7-8, 1997

01Jul99

Who murdered Borys Derevyanko?

August 11, 1997

As the conclusion of your 23Oct94 60 Minutes story, The Ugly Face of Freedom, was that

Ukraine is a place in which Ukrainians practice violence against Jews, it is highly

relevant that Borys Derevyanko is Ukrainian and Eduard Hurvits is Jewish. You went to

Ukraine looking for evidence of Ukrainians harming Jews, you failed to find such

evidence, but you broadcast your conclusion anyway. The true story that you would not

broadcast, and that was readily documentable, is that Ukraine is a place in which Jews

harm Ukrainians. The plainest moral to be drawn from the Derevyanko-Hurvits story is

that when a muckraking Ukrainian editor takes on a corrupt Jewish politician, the

Ukrainian editor ends up dead. That is the reality of Ukraine. It was the reality of

Ukraine when you visited it in 1994, it was the reality of Ukraine before 1994, and it

has been the reality of Ukraine since 1994.

As in earlier letters, I fault you for not reporting such incidents as are in the above

table that took place before 1994, and I fault you for precipitating such incidents that

took place after 1994. Thus, to the blood that is already on your hands, I add the

blood of Borys Derevyanko. You had the opportunity in your 1994 broadcast to come out

on the side of the victims against the butchers, but you preferred to side with the

butchers against the victims, and Borys Derevyanko has been one of the casualties of

your decision.

Lubomyr Prytulak

cc: Yaakov Bleich, Ed Bradley, Jeffrey Fager, Don Hewitt, Steve Kroft, Andy Rooney,

Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace, Simon Wiesenthal.

HOME DISINFORMATION PEOPLE SAFER 2082 hits since 04Jul99

Morley Safer Letter 13 04Jul99 The Wiesenthal-Safer Calumny