ГУЛаг Палестины - Лев Гунин

description resembles that of the notorious war criminal Dr. Mengele. ...

Personal data of the subject taken from various documentation reveal the

following in comparison with the information contained in the Commission file

with respect to Dr. Mengele:

Year of Birth

Height

Weight

Eyes

Face

Chin

Subject

& 1913

6'3"+

195-215 lbs

Blue

Oval (from Photo)

Dr. Mengele

1911

5'8"+

Medium build

Brown

Round

Round

In addition, the picture of the subject appearing in the various documents

received, does not suggest that he resembles Dr. Mengele. All other search

responses were negative.

CASE NO. 431. This individual was brought to the attention of the Commission

by the RCMP, whose source of information was Mr. Sol Littman. Mr. Littman had

forwarded a letter to the RCMP from a private individual. It was alleged in

the letter that the subject under investigation had been in charge of an

unnamed camp and was believed to have shot civilians. ... The Commission

interviewed the individual who submitted the subject's name to Mr. Littman and

was advised that this individual had subsequently determined that the subject

under investigation had been a prisoner of war and further that the complaint

was unfounded.

CASE NO. 433. This individual was brought to the attention of the Commission

by the RCMP, whose source of information was an anonymous informant. The only

allegation made was that the subject was "a possible German involved in war

crimes". No specific allegation or evidence against the subject was provided.

... The Commission reviewed material available from the RCMP and CSIS, which

determined that the subject was born in 1933, and for that reason could not

have been involved in the commission of war crimes between 1939 and 1945.

CASE NO. 526. This individual was brought to the attention of the Commission

by the Canadian Jewish Congress, whose source of information was a private

individual. It was alleged that the subject under investigation might be Dr.

Josef Mengele. ... The Department of External Affairs reported that it had a

record in respect of the individual, but that the individual had been born in

1928 in Canada.... ... Furthermore, the subject's name is not one of the

aliases used from time to time by Josef Mengele.

CASE NO. 561. This individual was brought to the attention of the Commission

by the RCMP, whose source of information was the Canadian Jewish Congress. It

was alleged that the subject was responsible for the deaths of "hundreds of

Jews." No specific evidence of the alleged war crimes was provided. ...

Records of the Department of Employment and Immigration ... indicate that the

subject was born in 1941....

CASE NO. 588.1. This individual was brought to the attention of the Commission

by the RCMP, who were investigating the suspicions of the Department of

Employment and Immigration officials that the individual might be older than he

claims and might be hiding a questionable past, which may have involved the

Nazi Party. ... It was verified [through various investigations] that the

subject is indeed who he claims to be and that he was indeed born in 1929. He

was barely 10 years old at the start of the war.

Sol Littman's Mengele Scare

As another piece of evidence that we are in the midst of a witch hunt a witch hunt in which

Simon Wiesenthal plays the role of chief inquisitor - consider Sol Littman's Mengele Scare. On

December 20, 1984, Mr. Littman - Canadian representative of the Simon Wiesenthal Center - wrote

to the Prime Minister of Canada unequivocally affirming that

Mengele, employing the alias of Dr. Joseph Menke, applied to the Canadian

embassy in Buenos Aires for admission to Canada as a landed immigrant in late

May or early June, 1962. (In Jules Deschenes, Commission of Inquiry on War

Criminals, 1986, p. 67)

Then on January 23, 1985, Ralph Blumenthal wrote an article in the New York Times captioned

"Records indicate Mengele sought Canadian visa":

Other records indicate that Mengele applied to the Canadian Embassy in Buenos

Aires for a Canadian visa in 1962 under a pseudonym and that the Canadians

informed American intelligence officials of this attempt.

This information was widely reprinted and broadcast. Subsequently, both Mr. Blumenthal and Mr.

Littman affirmed that the information in this article concerning Josef Mengele came solely from

Mr. Littman. However, following its thorough investigation, the Commission concluded:

There is no documentary evidence whatsoever of an attempt by Dr. Joseph

Mengele to seek admission to Canada from Buenos Aires in 1962.

The affirmation has come from Mr. Sol Littman, and from him alone. ...

The advice which Littman solicited [in the course of his own research] ...

did not support his assumptions, but put him on notice about their fragility.

As stated at the outset, all that Littman could rely on was "speculation,

impression, possibility, hypothesis". Yet he chose to transmute them into

statements of facts which he publicized....

This is a case where not a shred of evidence has been tendered to support

Mr. Littman's statement to the Prime Minister of Canada on 20 December 1984, or

Mr. Ralph Blumenthal's article in the New York Times on 23 January 1985.

(Jules Deschenes, Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals, 1986, p. 70)

In view of Sol Littman's irresponsibility in engineering the Mengele Scare, it is not a little

ironic to note that it was this very scare which was the prime cause of the Canadian government

constituting the Jules Deschenes Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals. We see this

demonstrated when the reasons for the Commission being constituted are laid out, and Sol

Littman's Mengele disinformation - at the time accepted as information - appears at the top of

the list:

WHEREAS concern has been expressed about the possibility that Joseph Mengele,

an alleged Nazi war criminal, may have entered or attempted to enter

Canada.... (Jules Deschenes, Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals, 1986, p.

17)

What we see in Sol Littman, then, is a case somewhat paralleling that of Morley Safer - a single

Jew creates a story out of thin air, and gets it disseminated to tens of millions of people

through a Jewish-controlled media which conveniently neglects to verify it prior to

publication. In Littman's case, he goes well beyond dissemination - he further succeeds in

pressuring the Canadian government to waste taxpayer money (always in short supply for education

and health care) on a costly inquiry which turns up just about nothing, and whose only

appreciable benefit is not to the Canadian people, and not even to Jews collectively, but only

to Sol Littman personally - which benefit is the stirring up of Jewish anxiety on the one hand

together with anti-Jewish resentment on the other, both of which are necessary to increasing the

flow of Jewish contributions into Sol Littman's coffers. Sol Littman, in short, is a parasite

upon the Jewish people, preying on the fears of the more gullible of them, essentially playing a

role not unlike that of Stephen King in which the bigger a scare he is able to elicit out of his

audience by means of the fantastic stories he is able to concoct, the greater is his success.

Repeating the same principle in different words, we may say that the more anti-Semitism Sol

Littman is able to provoke, the greater is his success.

How does Sol Littman come to be in the vanguard of the fight to suppress hate on the Internet?

Consider the information on Sol Littman which can be found on The Ukrainian Archive: (1)

Reviewing the sampling higher above of irresponsible denunciations submitted to the Deschenes

Commission, we note that four of them were submitted by Sol Littman, suggesting that in the full

list of denunciations, his contribution would have been substantial. (2) The Sol Littman

Mengele scare immediately above. (3) My 27May98 letter to Demjanjuk persecutor Neal Sher, in

which I present data supporting the conclusion that Neal Sher and Sol Littman are members of a

subculture who lie not only to those who are not members of their subculture, but to each other

as well, thus steeping themselves in untruths. Still more information is available on a web

site unconnected to UKAR devoted exclusively to exposing Sol Littman. Given the present UKAR

disclosure of Sol Littman's irresponsibility, and given the similar disclosure on other sites on

the Internet, as the one cited above, it is little wonder that Sol Littman is today a leading

exponent for society bestowing upon him (and others like him) the power to suppress information

on the Internet when he decides (or they decide) that it expresses "hate." Perhaps a suspicion

that it would be healthy to occasionally entertain is that those who call loudest for the

suppression of information may be those with the most to hide.

Salem's Was Not the Last Witch Hunt

Surely the above data convinces us that many of the horrors that we all despise - that even Mr.

Safer might profess to despise - are being realized as contemporary actualities. Slanderous and

unfounded allegations. Anonymous letters of accusation. Government agencies investigating

people for no other reason than that someone has submitted their names. McCarthyism. A witch

hunt. Individuals accused of having committed war crimes while they were still in diapers. And

instead of standing back from this mass hysteria or exposing it, 60 Minutes has chosen instead

to play a contributory role.

The Deschenes Commission cites 31 newspaper accounts between 1971 and 1986 of Nazi war criminals

residing in Canada, and points out that this list is not exhaustive. Decades of coverage of

such sensational accusations leaves a permanent impression on the minds of the public, while the

Deschenes Commission refutation takes place only once, and does not carry the same lurid

appeal. The net effect is a propaganda victory for the false accusers. 60 Minutes is making

its contribution to this phenomenon - its false accusations in "The Ugly Face of Freedom" were

long and sensational and will be remembered by many, its retraction will be short and dull and

will be remembered by few. 60 Minutes hands Ukrainophobes another victory.

Letters to Simon Wiesenthal

I have written a number of letters to Simon Wiesenthal asking for his clarification on the

issues raised above, and on other issues relating to his credibility and to his calumniation of

Ukraine. These letters can be found by clicking the above link. Other material relating to

Simon Wiesenthal can be found scattered throughout the UKAR site, and can be located using the

Internal Search Engine whose link can be found on the Home Page. One item particularly worth

mentioning might be my sixth letter to Michael Jordan, Chairman of Westinghouse. Following

examination of any of these materials, clicking BACK on your browser will return you to this

location (if your browsing trail has not been too long).

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt

Paralysis of the Comparative

Function

60 Minutes' Cheap Shots

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Mailbag

A Sense of Responsibility

What 60 Minutes Should Do

PostScript

What Happened in Lviv?

According to Simon Wiesenthal on the 60 Minutes broadcast, in three days following the

evacuation of the Communist forces and before the arrival of the German troops, Ukrainian police

killed between five and six thousand Jews:

SAFER: He [Simon Wiesenthal] remembers that even before the Germans arrived,

Ukrainian police went on a 3-day killing spree.

WIESENTHAL: And in this 3 days in Lvov alone between 5 and 6 thousand Jews was

killed.

...

SAFER: But even before the Germans entered Lvov, the Ukrainian militia, the

police, killed 3,000 people in 2 days here.

Some 60 Minutes viewers may have been struck by the curious observation that while the 60

Minutes expert witness - Simon Wiesenthal - claimed that the number of Jews killed was "between

5 and 6 thousand," in three days, the interviewer - Morley Safer chose to reduce that number

killed to "3,000" and the duration of the killing to two days - but without informing the viewer

on what grounds he did so.

Let us begin our examination of this claim by reviewing the historical context.

Historical Context of the Lviv Pogrom

Eight Years Previously. Although Western Ukraine was spared the induced famine of 1932-1933 in

which some six million Ukrainians perished, Western Ukrainians were nevertheless aware of the

famine in adjacent Soviet Ukraine and aware that it was administered at the top by Lazar

Kaganovich, a Jew, and was supported at the bottom by cadres, many said to be Jewish, who moved

from village to village confiscating grain and livestock.

During the previous 21 months. Western Ukraine was annexed by Soviet forces in 1939 for a

period of 21 months until the Germans arrived in 1941. What was the experience of Western

Ukrainians under Russian communism? It was traumatic. On top of suppression of culture and

confiscation of property, there was terror:

The most widespread and feared measure was deportation. Without warning,

without trial, even without formal accusation, thousands of alleged "enemies of

the people" were arrested, packed into cattle cars, and shipped to Siberia and

Kazakhstan to work as slave laborers under horrible conditions. Many of these

deportees, including entire families, perished. ... According to Metropolitan