ГУЛаг Палестины - Лев Гунин

made any discussions about X-ish genocide forbidden, and this is when

the leaders of X-s continue benefiting from enormous compensation almost

a century after the genocide. Using historically inevitable from time

to time unfriendly tendencies towards just any minority as an excuse,

nation's X leaders are using excessive force against any manifestation

of such unfriendly attitude or even what they wrongly interpreting as

"unfriendly". Consequently denouncing bloody crimes against

humanity of the regime of the State of X and local X-s councils (organizations)

in Diaspora is called "xenophobia". Anybody, who raised deep

questions about the human rights situation in the State of X and within

local X-s communities, is severely persecuted. Naturally, such a policy

would provoke spontaneous anti-X-ers feelings, and the denial of X-ish

genocide as the most natural automatic reaction. In the same way simple

as not very simple people will always test extremes of the "Jewish

power"; and "Jewish conspiracy" by denying Holocaust and

watching an expected Jewish excessive force in return. Blocking any

civilized discussion about any topic directly or indirectly involving

Jews (on historical, philosophical, ethical, religious level), Jewish

extremists will face more and more dangerous for innocent ordinary Jews

response on the primitive level. Jewish extremist organizations and

the government of Israel do not care about safety and wealth of ordinary

Jews. They represent a mighty totalitarian power, which exist in no

one interests. Only a small group of bastards benefits from this power.

This power became a modern inquisition, one of the modern Evils. However,

only one of Them. Communist regimes, eastern dictatorships, Indian-type

"democracies" (Israel is just one of them), anti-European

regimes like Pakistan, Afganistan, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, etc.

they are the same. We (people who consider themselves as Europeans,

no matter what skin color or face they have) must understand who are

enemies and who are friends of Europe. We have already our culture half

destroyed, our leaders corrupted by the Eastern powers, our countries

in Northern hemisphere (plus Australia) have been already transformed

into a "transitional" (remember: Eastern block, Western

block?) between capitalism (democracy) - and Eastern-type tyranny-slavery.

Since 1980-s, by eliminating civil freedoms and privacy, Western governments

slowly but inevitably transforming their countries into societies of

the eastern type. Jewish extremism is an important player in this process

of blowing up the European civilization from within. Jewish extremists

are traditionally anti-democratic reactionaries, who's goals are to destroy

democracy and progressive thinking everywhere. Their doctrine is to

take just any rights from the people, turn majority into slaves, and

eliminate basic human rights and freedoms. Their main allay is not USA

or Canada - as most of us are thinking - but UK. How comes that Israel,

a country, where Christians are persecute, beaten and humiliated, became

the most important "friend" of the Christian world? How comes that the

most brutal regimes in the world - like India, Israel, Pakistan, or

Kazakstan, were called democracies? Why and by whom Saudi Arabia, Bahrain,

South Korea, Kazahstan, Israel and other countries with hatred to European

culture and anti-European propaganda were considered as allays - and

Iraq, Lebanon, Iran, or Serbia - not? Tyranny, starvation, exploitation

of children, numbers of repressed people, scale of poverty and homelessness

in Iraq, Iran, and some other anti-democracies are several times lower

then in "great democracies" like India or Israel, where wide number

of people are treated like cattle. How comes that Israel, a country,

where Christians are persecute, beaten and humiliated, became the most

important "friend" of the Christian world? How comes that the most brutal

regimes in the world - like India, Israel, Pakistan, or Kazakstan, were

called democracies? Why and by whom Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, South Korea,

Kazahstan, Israel and other countries with hatred to European culture

and anti-European propaganda were considered as allays - and Iraq, Lebanon,

Iran, or Serbia - not? Tyranny, starvation, exploitation of children,

numbers of repressed people, scale of poverty and homelessness in Iraq,

Iran, and some other anti-democracies are several times lower then in

"great democracies" like India or Israel, where wide number of people

are treated like cattle. Instead of supporting nations, which are historically,

traditionally, culturally closer to Europeans, our rulers, corrupted

or threatened by the Eastern regimes like Israel, are supporting our

most furious enemies. Support, which is given to the Jewish Extremists

by the governments of the Western world, is not popular. People are

not supporting it. Sooner or later this situation will resolve in pogroms

and insults against the ordinary Jews. We all must be awaken before

it not too late...

MORE (1)

CONTENT

1. Demonizing nations

(Jewish extremists' lie and columniation of the whole nations like Ukrainians and Polish)

2. Israel-Jewish Diaspora World-Wide criminal activity

(Jewish extremists lobbism is behind the cover up of the Israel-related criminal activity world wide and money laundering)

3. Dissidents - victims of the Jewish Extremists' global totalitarian power (Israeli military assault against Western democracy)

(Thousands or maybe millions of people are persecuted by Jewish totalitarian machine all over the world. Persecutions include kidnapping, executions, assassinations, batteries, and administrative, financial and other terror)

4. Politically and Criminally Motivated Jewish Medical Mafia

5. Victor Ostrovsky's "By Way of Deception" extracts

1. Demonizing nations

(Jewish extremists' lie and columniation of the whole nations like Ukrainians and Polish)

FROM UKRAINIAN ARCHIVE WEB SITE

http://ukar.org/

HOME DISINFORMATION 60 MINUTES 19628 hits since 26Jan98

We saw above that an entire Ukrainian family was shot by the Nazis for hiding a Jewish woman,

but can we find a single instance of an entire Jewish family being shot by the Bolsheviks for hiding

a Ukrainian woman? We saw above that the Ukrainian mayor of a town was shot by the Nazis for

helping Jews, but can we find a single instance of a Jewish mayor - and there were many

Jewish mayors in Ukraine - being shot by the Bolsheviks for helping Ukrainians? We saw above

Metropolitan Sheptytsky risking his life and the lives of other Ukrainians by hiding Jews on church

property, but can we find a single instance of a rabbi risking his life and the lives of other Jews by

hiding Ukrainians on synagogue property?

The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes

Lubomyr Prytulak

Last updated:

9Feb98 Rudolph Vrba Accusation added to the section on "Paralysis of the Comparative Function"

24Feb98 Einsatzgruppen quotes added to the section on "What Happened in Lviv?"

28Mar98 Himmler quote added toward the bottom of "Were Ukrainians Nazis?"

9Jun98 Link to Shapoval added toward the bottom of "What Happened in Lviv? During the preceding few days"

13Jun98 Link to Sion-Osnova Controversy added to the bottom of "Quality of Translation"

13Jun98 Link to discussion of Jewish Ghetto Police added to the bottom of "Collective Guilt"

24Feb99 Comparison of German SS and Ukrainian Waffen-SS oaths added to "The Galicia Division"

24Mar99 External link to Symon Petliura page at bottom of "Symon Petliura"

12Jun99 Elaboration with external link at bottom of "Sol Littman's Mengele Scare"

13Jun99 Comment on Jewish chain of command within CBS added to "Preface"

03Jul99 Nine quotes added near bottom of "What Happened in Lviv?"

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt

Paralysis of the Comparative

Function

60 Minutes' Cheap Shots

Ukrainian Anti-Semitism

Jewish Ukrainophobia

Mailbag

A Sense of Responsibility

What 60 Minutes Should Do

PostScript

Preface

On 23 Oct 1994, CBS television broadcast a twelve-minute segment on its weekly

investigative-journalism show 60 Minutes titled The Ugly Face of Freedom, produced by Jeffrey

Fager and hosted by Morley Safer. The program's goal was to indict Ukrainian society and

history and to discredit the legitimacy of the Ukrainian State. The program's method was to

pack the broadcast with what may be the most concentrated segment of disinformation, calumny,

and hatred ever to make its appearance in the mainstream media. The program had been ready for

over half a year, but was not broadcast until the first official visit to the United States of

Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma. Whether this timing was by coincidence or design became the

subject of comment among some program viewers.

From the beginning of the affair, it could not escape notice that this broadcast was not only an

attack upon Ukrainians and upon the nation of Ukraine, but that it was a Jewish attack, this

because every last person bearing responsibility for the broadcast, from the very top of the

chain of command to the very bottom, was Jewish:

Laurence Tisch, Chairman and CEO of CBS

Eric Ober, President of CBS News

Don Hewitt, Executive Producer of 60 Minutes

Jeffrey Fager, Producer of The Ugly Face of Freedom

Morley Safer, Program Host

Simon Wiesenthal, one of the two featured program witnesses

Yaakov Bleich, the other of the two featured program witnesses

That attacks upon Ukraine come overwhelmingly from Jews has been amply documented on the

Ukrainian Archive (UKAR), as for example in the discussion of Jerzy Kosinski, where it is noted

that ten out of ten of the leading calumniators of Ukraine are Jews. Possible reasons for this

phenomenon have been discussed throughout UKAR, with three of the chief reasons being: (1) the

acceleration of the brain drain from Ukraine to Israel with the help of a partly-magnified and

partly-incited resentment against Jews, (2) the heightening of Jewish cohesion through the

inculcation of fear and hatred of Gentiles, as by the Jewish keeping alive of a distorted memory

of the Khmelnytsky rebellion of 1648, and (3) the need to discredit the historical observation

that Jews typically victimize Ukrainians by inculcating the opposite image of Ukrainians

victimizing Jews.

On 15 Nov 1994, I mailed a letter to then CBS Chairman Laurence A. Tisch which consisted of a

lengthy critique of the 60 Minutes broadcast. I simultaneously mailed copies of this letter to

the host of the broadcast, Morley Safer, as well as the co-hosts Ed Bradley, Steve Kroft, Lesley

Stahl, and Mike Wallace. I received no reply from any of them. On 17 Dec 1994, I mailed a

covering letter to Laurence Tisch together with an expanded version of my critique (the critique

was now titled The Ugly Face of 60 Minutes, and was dated 11 Dec 1994), with copies to the same

host and co-hosts. I again received no reply.

In an attempt to clarify the accuracy of the 60 Minutes broadcast, other letters were sent,

among them letters to Michael Jordan, Chairman of Westinghouse, following the Westinghouse

purchase of CBS in 1995, letters to Simon Wiesenthal, star witness on The Ugly Face of Freedom,

and letters to Rabbi Yaakov Bleich, supporting witness on the same program. Nor were my letters

the only ones sent - in fact, CBS received some 16,000 pieces of mail protesting the 60 Minutes

broadcast. To my knowledge, not a single one of these letters has ever been answered, or even

acknowledged, the muteness of CBS and others involved leaving the impression that they are

unable to muster any defense for the 60 Minutes broadcast.

At that time, and since, I have circulated copies of my critique widely, and have received many

favorable comments. In a small number of instances, I was grateful for helpful suggestions as

to minor revisions; however, no one challenged any of my major criticisms or arguments,

encouraging me to believe that these were fundamentally correct.

Below you will find the latest version of this same critique, substantially longer and more

detailed than the original, but basically offering no more than an elaboration of the material

already long in the hands of CBS. I will not again waste postage mailing this critique to CBS

with the advent of the internet, there are less costly ways to disseminate information; if CBS

wants to see this latest version, it will have no trouble finding it.

The defects of the 60 Minutes broadcast as so multifarious, that it is difficult to capture them

in one brief statement. If one were to attempt to do so, then the statement might mention that

60 Minutes misrepresented the historical record, provided mistranslations of statements

originally made in Ukrainian, suppressed pertinent information concerning Ukrainian-Jewish

relations during World War II, encouraged retrogressive notions of collective guilt, altered the

dates on which events were supposed to have occurred, doctored the sound track, accepted dubious

and implausible statements from sources whose credibility had not been established or whose

credibility should have been suspect, and generally in numerous instances employed questionable

evidence to point to conclusions that were untrue, provocative, and inflammatory. There follows

below an outline of the chief defects of this 60 Minutes broadcast.

CONTENTS:

Preface

The Galicia Division

Quality of Translation

Ukrainian Homogeneity

Were Ukrainians Nazis?

Simon Wiesenthal

What Happened in Lviv?

Nazi Propaganda Film

Collective Guilt