Mens Rea в уголовном праве Соединенных Штатов Америки - Геннадий Есаков
Шрифт:
Интервал:
Закладка:
150. Model Penal Code Selected Bibliography // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 627–639.
151. Moore M.S. Prima Facie Moral Culpability // Boston University Law Review. Boston (Mass.), 1996. Vol. 76, № 1–2. P. 319–333.
152. Morrison T.W. Fair Warning and the Retroactive Judicial Expansion of Federal Criminal Statutes // Southern California Law Review. Los Angeles (Cal.), 2001. Vol. 74, № 2. P. 455–521.
153. Mueller G. O. W. Criminal Law and Administration // New York University Law Review. N.Y., 1959. Vol. 34, № 1. P. 83–116.
154. Murder in the Course of Committing Suicide – R. v. Spence, Quarterly Summary // The Journal of Criminal Law. No. 82. L., 1957. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 192.
155. Note, Burden of proving accident: the golden thread in the Privy Council // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1970. Vol. 86, № 344. P. 433–435.
156. Note, Death resulting from act amounting only to civil wrong // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1931. Vol. 47, № 186. P. 167–168.
157. Note, Felony Murder as a First Degree Offense: An Anachronism Retained // The Yale Law Journal. New Haven (Conn.), 1957. Vol. 66, № 3. P. 427–435.
158. Note, Felony Murder: A Tort Law Reconceptualization // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1986. Vol. 99, № 8. P. 19181935.
159. Note, Intention and foresight // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1957. Vol. 67, № 267. P. 283–284.
160. Note, Manslaughter and dangerous driving // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1937. Vol. 53, № 211. P. 306–307.
161. Note, Mens rea in criminal statutes // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1958. Vol. 74, № 295. P. 342–343.
162. Note, Negligence and the General Problems of Criminal Responsibility // The Yale Law Journal New Haven (Conn.), 1972. Vol. 81, № 5. P. 949–979.
163. Note, Objective test in murder cases // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1956. Vol. 72, № 286. P. 166–168.
164. Note, Subjective or objective test of presumption in murder cases // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1961. Vol. 77, № 305. P. 1–5.
165. Note, The Cultural Defense in the Criminal Law // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1986. Vol. 99, № 6. P. 1293–1311.
166. Note, The Law Commission’s Report on Imputed Criminal Intent 11 The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1967. Vol. 83, № 331. P. 321–323.
167. Notes on Recent Cases, Criminal Law– Murder– Felony involving personal violence – Use of loaded firearm a violent measures – Death of victim caused by inadvertent discharge of firearm held to be murder. R. v. Jarmain. [1946] 1 K.B. 74 // The Cambridge Law Journal. L, 1946. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 243–244.
168. Noyes H.S. Felony-Murder Doctrine Through the Federal Looking Glass // Indiana Law Journal. Bloomington, 1994. Vol. 69, № 2. P. 533–579.
169. O’Keefe P. Note, Criminal Law: Voluntary Intoxication as Affecting Criminal Intent // The Cornell Law Quarterly. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1921. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 193–196.
170. Oberer W.E. The Deadly Weapon Doctrine– Common Law Origin // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1962. Vol. 75, № 8. P. 1565–1576.
171. Packer H.L. The Model Penal Code and Beyond // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1963. Vol. 63, № 4. P. 594–607.
172. Parker J.S. The Economics of Mens Rea // Virginia Law Review. Charlottesville (Va.), 1993. Vol. 79, № 4. P. 741–811.
173. Parry J.T. Culpability, Mistake, and Official Interpretations of Law // American Journal of Criminal Law. Austin (Tex.), 1997. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 1–78.
174. Perkins R.M. A Rationale of Mens Rea // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1939. Vol. 52, № 6. P. 905–928.
175. Perkins R.M. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law and Procedure. Brooklyn: The Foundation Press, Inc., 1952. xxxv p., 851 p.
176. Perkins R.M. Criminal Law. Brooklyn: The Foundation Press, Inc., 1957. xxivp., 1011 p.
177. Pike L.O. A History of Crime in England. Illustrating the Changes of the Laws in the Progress of Civilisation. Written from the Public Records and Other Contemporary Evidence. Volume I: From the Roman Invasion to the Accession of Henry VII. L.: Smith, Elder & Co., 1873. xxx p., 539 [1] p.
178. Plucknett T.F.T. Edward I and Criminal Law: The Wiles Lectures Given at the Queen’s University, Belfast, 1958. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1960. vii [i] p., 104 p.
179. Pollock F. The King’s Peace // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1885. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 37–50.
180. Pollock F., Maitland F. W. The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I. 2nd ed. Volume I. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1898. xxxviii [ii] p., 688 p.
181. Pollock F., Maitland F. W. The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I. 2nd ed. Volume II. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1898. xv p., 692 p.
182. Pound R. The Development of American Law and Its Deviation from English Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1951. Vol. 61, № 265. P. 49–66.
183. Pound R. The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence // The Green Bag. Boston (Mass.), 1907. Vol. 19, № 10. P. 607–615.
184. Pradel J. Droit penal compare. P.: Dalloz, 1995. viii p., 719 p.
185. Prevezer S. Notes of Cases, Conspiracy and Public Mischief // The Modern Law Review. L., 1954. Vol. 17, № 1. P. 72–74.
186. Prevezer S. The English Homicide Act: A New Attempt to Revise the Law of Murder // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1957. Vol. 57, № 5. P. 624–652.
187. Rauseo K.P. Criminal Law– The Felony-Murder Rule Encompasses a Conviction Predicated upon Allowing a Child to Habitually Suffer – State v. Stewart, 663 A. 2d 912 (R. I. 1995) // Suffolk University Law Review. Boston (Mass.), 1997. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 563–568.
188. Recent Cases, Comparative Law– U. S. S. R. – Radio Broadcast Held Not to Be a Publication for Purpose of Determining when Statute Goes into Effect // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1949. Vol. 62, № 4. P. 691–693.
189. Recent Cases, Criminal Law – Defenses – Reasonable Mistake of Law May Be a Defense to Bigamy Prosecution // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1949. Vol. 62, № 8. P. 1393–1394.
190. Recent Cases, Criminal Law– In General– Courts Have Power as Custodies Morum To Punish Conspiracy To Do Acts Newly Defined as Corruptive of Public Morals. Shaw v. Director of Public Prosecutions (H.L. 1961) // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1962. Vol. 75, № 8. P. 1652–1655.
191. Recent Cases, Criminal Law – Jurisdiction – An Agreement To Commit a Crime in Another Country Is Not an Indictable Conspiracy. Board of Trade v. Queen (H.L. 1957) // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1957. Vol. 71, № 2. P. 371–374.
192. Recent Cases, Homicide– In General– Defendant Not Guilty of Felony Murder for Death of Cofelon Justifiably Shot by Policeman. Commonwealth v. Redline (Pa. 1958) // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1958. Vol. 71, № 8. P. 1565–1567.
193. Recent Developments, Criminal Law: Felony-Murder Rule – Felon’s Responsibility for Death of Accomplice // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1965. Vol. 65, № 8. P. 1496–1500.
194. Report: Criminal Liability for Self-Induced Intoxication / Parliament of Victoria, Law Reform Committee. Melbourne, 1999. ixp., 234 p.
195. Richardson H.G. Azo, Drogheda, and Bracton // The English Historical Review. L, 1944. Vol. 59, № 233. P. 22–47.
196. Richardson H.G. Tancred, Raymond, and Bracton // The English Historical Review. L., 1944. Vol. 59, № 235. P. 376–384.
197. Riesenfeld S.A. Negligent Homicide. A Study in Statutory Interpretation // California Law Review. Berkeley (Cal.), 1936. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 1–40.
198. Robinson P. H. Imputed Criminal Liability // The Yale Law Journal. New Haven (Conn.), 1984. Vol. 93, № 4. P. 609–676.
199. Robinson P. H. In Defense of the Model Penal Code: A Reply to Professor Fletcher // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1998. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 25–43.
200. Robinson P. H, Darley J.M. The Utility of Desert // Northwestern University Law Review. Chicago (III.), 1997. Vol. 91, № 2. P. 453–499.
201. Robinson P. H, Grail J.A. Element Analysis in Defining Criminal Liability: The Model Penal Code and Beyond // Stanford Law Review. Stanford, 1983. Vol. 35, № 4. P. 681–762.
202. Robinson P.H Causing the Conditions of One’s Own Defense: A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law Doctrine // Virginia Law Review. Charlottesville (Va.), 1985. Vol. 71, № 1. P. 1–63.
203. Robinson P.H. Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1982. Vol. 82, № 2. P. 199–291.
204. Roman M.J. Comment, «Once More Unto the Breach, Dear Friends, Once More»: A Call to Re-Evaluate the Felony-Murder Doctrine in the Wake of State v. Oimen and State v. Rivera 11 Marquette Law Review. Milwaukee (Wis.), 1994. Vol. 77, № 4. P. 785–828.
205. Roth N.E., Sundby S.E. The Felony-Murder Rule: A Doctrine at Constitutional Crossroads // Cornell Law Review. Ithaca (N.Y.), 1985. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 446–492.
206. Roulston R.P. Introduction to Criminal Law in New South Wales. Sydney: Butterworths, 1975. xiv p., 225 p.
207. Ryu P. K., Silving H. Error Juris: A Comparative Study // The University of Chicago Law Review. Chicago, 1957. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 421–471.
208. Sayre F.B. Book Review, Glueck: Mental Disorder and the Criminal Law // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1926. Vol. 39, № 4. P. 520–523.
209. Sayre F.B. Mens Rea II Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1932. Vol. 45, № 6. P. 974–1026.
210. Sayre F.B. Public Welfare Offenses // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1933. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 55–88.
211. Sayre F.B. The Present Signification of Mens Rea in the Criminal Law // Harvard Legal Essays / Written in Honour of and Printed to Joseph Beale and Samuel Williston, by Morton Carlisle Campbell, Zechariah Chafee, Jr., Edwin Merrick Dodd, Jr., & c. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1934. P. 399–417.
212. Schmitthoff M. The Science of Comparative Law // The Cambridge Law Journal. L., 1939. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 94–110.
213. Schopp R.F. Reconciling «Irreconcilable» Capital Punishment Doctrine as Comparative and Noncomparative Justice // Florida Law Review. Gainesville (Fla.), 2001. Vol. 53, № 3. P. 475–527.
214. Schulz F. Bracton and Raymond de Penafort // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1945. Vol. 61, № 243. P. 286–292.
215. Schwartz D.W. Note, Imposing the Death Sentence for Felony Murder on a Non-Triggerman // Stanford Law Review. Stanford, 1985. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 857–888.
216. Scrutton T.E. Roman Law in Bracton // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1885. Vol. 1, № 4. P. 425–441.
217. Sendor B.B. Crime as Communication: An Interpretive Theory of the Insanity Defense and the Mental Elements of Crime // The Georgetown Law Journal. Washington, 1986. Vol. 74, № 6. P. 1371–1434.
218. Simons K.W. Book Review: Self-Defense, Mens Rea, and Bernhard Goetz // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1989. Vol. 89, № 5. P. 1179–1200.
219. Simons K.W. Mistake and Impossibility, Law and Fact, and Culpability: A Speculative Essay // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1990. Vol. 81, № 1. P. 447–517.
220. Simons K.W. Rethinking Mental States // Boston University Law Review. Boston (Mass.), 1992. Vol. 72, № 3. P. 463–554.
221. Simons K. W. The Relevance of Community Values to Just Deserts: Criminal Law, Punishment Rationales, and Democracy // Hofstra Law Review. Hempstead (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 635–666.
222. Simons K.W. When is Strict Liability Just? // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1997. Vol. 87, № 4. P. 1075–1137.
223. Singer R. The Model Penal Code and Three Two (Possibly Only One) Ways Courts Avoid Mens Rea // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 139–216.
224. Singer R., HusakD. Of Innocence and Innocents: The Supreme Court and Mens Rea Since Herbert Packer // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1999. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 861–945.
225. Singer R.G. The Proposed Duty to Inquire as Affected by Recent Criminal Law Decisions in the United States Supreme Court // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 701–754.